Thursday, November 30, 2006

AFRICA : 'The people we lend to are full of ideas'

A charity that gives loans to women in Malawi to enable them to start their own businesses is transforming lives. Nick Britten reports

Telegraph Christmas Charity Appeal

Alena Phiri sits in her tiny hut wondering where she will find the next meal for her two children and the orphan she looks after.

Pedal power: Alena Phirl set up a bicycle repair workshop with money from MicroLoan. She now has a vision of how she wants to expand the business

When the rains come, probably next week, water will pour through the grass thatch roof. She struggles to feed her family, and the water they drink is filthy.

Ten miles away, Chiwanjira Stambuli has 13 young mouths to feed – four of her own and nine orphans passed to her following the deaths of her brother and sister. It is a hopeless task and her rice-growing business does not bring in enough. Too often, she says, the children go without meals.

Malawi, a former British colony, is the ninth poorest country in the world. The effects of Aids and extreme poverty mean that the average Malawian is unlikely to live beyond 40. Fifteen per cent will contract HIV and die from Aids.

TB and malaria kill regularly as treatment remains just out of reach. Rural hospitals regularly run out of drugs and, for the dying, the local witch doctors still do a roaring, if hopeless, trade.

Malawi has little export business, an unpredictable climate and none of the big game or tourist attractions that benefit neighbouring countries. In the cities, locals talk about buying a car in the same terms we would use about buying a house.

In the countryside, the endless lines of people trudging up and down the roadside stop to gape at anything with four wheels.

Children swarm around our car looking for plastic water bottles – not for the clean water but for the pittance they can collect by selling them.

Yet, in the midst of all this, there are signs that life can improve. Following a period of political instability, the country has its first real democratic government since the long rule of the dictator Hastings Banda; and, thanks in large part to charities such as the MicroLoan Foundation, families have the chance to put tin roofs on their houses, send a child to school, or have access to clean water.

MicroLoan directs itself predominantly at women in Malawi, who bear the weight of responsibility for their families and communities. The charity lends small amounts of money to those who are keen to start their own businesses and some 10,000 have so far joined the scheme.

In the sprawling, bustling town of Nkhotakota, on the shores of Lake Malawi, where the foundation has a field office, many of the women say that their men take little interest in family life, often flitting between two or more wives and disappearing for days on end.

Women have to clothe and feed their children, look after the house and, increasingly, take the initiative to find the money to survive. And among them, there is a strong entrepreneurial spirit to improve.

MicroLoan's ethos is that it is better to give a hand up than a handout. "It's no good just giving money away," says the charity's founder, Peter Ryan. "It's about giving people dignity, empowering them.

"The people we lend to are full of ideas, yet a bank would not touch them and a loan shark, the only other way of getting money, would charge 100 or 200 per cent interest."

The charity lends to co-operatives – which then split the money between members for their projects – rather than directly to individuals. This promotes a sense of community and, more pragmatically, ensures that if one business fails, the others cover its losses to make the twice-monthly repayments.

Its next aim is to reach 20,000 loans and increase the number of regional offices from six to 15.

Initial loans are of between £15 and £180, the average being £40, and are repaid over four months with a 24 per cent interest rate. If successful, members can apply for a second, larger loan until they complete four cycles, when they are introduced to a bank for further loans at reduced rates.

The money comes hand in hand with business training and support from experienced business people, who often fly in from Britain at their own expense to help.

Alena Phiri, 25, owns 10 hectares of land on which she and her husband, Frackson, grow nuts and maize. They also earn a meagre wage tin-smithing. They have two children, aged 11 and nine, and took in the 11-year-old son of Alena's sister when she died from malaria.

Alena approached the MicroLoan office, a four-hour walk away, when she realised that starvation for her and her family was a definite possibility.

"I had little money and wanted to improve our lives," she says. "I used a loan to set up a stall repairing bicycles. So many people carry firewood on the backs of their bicycles but there was no one in the community to repair them."

She set up a small workshop and the bikes, as well as the money, have started rolling in.

"Business is good and it is easier to feed the children. My vision is to set up a hardware shop selling bicycle parts to go with the workshop."

Close by, Valetina Brighton, 20, who has set up a successful business selling fish and sugar, now wants to bring a maize mill into the community.

"We have a group of women who work well as a team and our lives have been transformed," she says. "Men could never do that. They would take the money or argue about it."

Last week, the MicroLoan Foundation opened a new head office in the town of Kasungo.

Richard Wildash, the British High Commissioner, said the charity's work was "very much in line" with the aim of the British and Malawi governments to empower women: "We believe in it and want to support it. It is very moving and encouraging to hear the testimonies of people involved in the MicroLoan Foundation.

"We are quite aware that money alone cannot change lives; it is people who change lives and the people involved in the MLF are committed to doing that."

This article can be found at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/main.jhtml;jsessionid=B2XJSBVOIUUCZQFIQMFCFF4AVCBQYIV0?xml=/health/2006/11/30/hmalawi30.xml

UK : Winning Muslim hearts and minds

These wars will be won or lost not just by soldiers, spies, and policemen, but ultimately by the wider public, says Michael Burleigh.

Constant warnings about terrorist threats evoke mixed public responses: rage, indifference, panic, or, from the liberal-Left, the clever patrician conceit that these are invented "nightmares". None of these is open to anyone aspiring to government, including the Conservative Party as it wrestles with these terribly difficult issues.

The Tories need a long-term strategy. Armed force can hold the line, but there are also the weapons of "soft power" that Conservatives should master at a time when New Labour offers little beyond a reflexive belligerency that, domestically at least, is often less real than rhetorical.

The primary battle today lies in the minds of opposing publics. Dominate their minds and the leaders will follow. Create enough daily chaos and bloodshed in Afghanistan or Iraq, which the Western media will happily replay, and the West will cave in for want of will.

The widespread discredit into which the Left-liberal ideology of multi-culturalism has fallen should make us more, not less, cosmopolitan. This is not just a matter of recruiting people with Arabic, Dari or Urdu into the security services: we also need to expand the circle of what we take a sympathetic interest in. What happened, for example, to the 5,000 Africans maimed by al-Qa'eda bombs in 1998? Did the children blinded by flying glass get an education?

As in the Cold War we need to foster and respect cultural dissidence. This was brought home to me when I read Last Summer of Reason, whose author, Tahir Djaout, was murdered in 1993 by Algerian Islamists. Those who like pop music could try the Indonesian rock star Ahmad Dhani, whose hit Warriors of Love is a brave, moderate, Sufi challenge to the terrorists of that country. Everywhere in the Islamic world — 80 per cent of which is non-Arab — there are reasonable, cosmopolitan people who do not want, if they are Lebanese Shia, to be represented by Hizbollah or ruled by Syria, nor to have their tastes dictated by clerical zealots. Let's reach out to them, or at least create some forum where we can be reminded of their existence. So far the West's public diplomacy has been pathetic.

Rather, we lazily allow Islamist fundamentalists to equate our culture with trashy television programmes about penile implants, rather than Bach, Rubens or Mozart, Newton, Pascal or Einstein. As the philosopher Roger Scruton has written, we should be more careful about what image (and reality) of ourselves we project into more traditional societies.

Far too often we concede too much to the terrorists' vision, not only of us, but of themselves. How exactly would the caliphate of bin Laden's imaginings be governed? Hardly at all, judging by the carnage that enveloped Afghanistan under the Taliban. What precisely do the self-appointed emirs and imams know about Islam? How do you subvert the cultural supremacy of Arabic within it? Surely we should be encouraging authoritative voices that regard radical jihadists as heretics rather than kow-towing to useless so-called "community" leaders?

We also unconsciously seem to accept the purity of motive of people prepared to immolate themselves, which is what suicide-homicide is intended to achieve. If the tactic is so Islamic, then why did it only occur from the 1983 bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon? How many suicide bombers have dysfunctional pasts involving adultery, criminality or prostitution? How much are the Saudis or Iranians paying posthumously for each "performance"?

Terrorist organisations are not monolithic. Those with limited regional goals could be "disaggregated'" from the aegis of al-Qa'eda. If they are essentially fundamentalists protesting about corruption, we might even agree with them, were it not for their tactics. The networks themselves are as amenable to analysis as any other organisation. They consist of ideologues, financiers, planners, engineers, public communications specialists, and humble dog's bodies. They can be engineering graduates or men who have been redeemed in prison, and, in the case of al-Qa'eda, they are from myriad ethnic backgrounds.

We also need to terminate the existence of "Londonistan". A dedicated border police might practise the sort of steely-eyed scrutiny that awaits anyone going to or leaving America. France and Germany have managed to deport 20 militant clerics each: what is the figure for Britain? These men chose to flout our liberality, so their fate elsewhere is not among our major concerns. It is a continent-wide disgrace that 200 European Muslims have been to Iraq to kill coalition soldiers. Did the trained survivors return here?

We are entitled to have accurate information about immigration, with open discussion of its cultural, as well as economic, merits and demerits. Clear lines need to be established about what the majority of people here are prepared to tolerate, for toleration is not some open-ended, one-way arrangement. It's all very well to say you are against the formation of inner-city ghettos potentially subtracted from common law, but how, precisely, do Conservatives imagine dispersing them or preventing their formation?

More thought needs to go into countering the main external sources of radicalisation, be it arranged marriages (for the malign role of women in perpetuating hatreds through children is often under-rated) or the textual and visual poison that streams through satellite and internet.

What is being done to counteract the build-up of committed convicted terrorists in our prisons, for it only took half a dozen IRA men to dominate Parkhurst or Whitemoor? What do Australian, Dutch, French or Israeli intelligence agencies have to say on these subjects, for our own do not have a monopoly of wisdom?

Military force plays a part in the present conflicts, but we will never prevail until we draw deeply on our cultural resources, thinking expansively and imaginatively, so as always to push our own game to a higher level. For, as I began by saying, these wars will be won or lost not just by soldiers, spies, and policemen, but ultimately by the wider public.

Michael Burleigh is a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford and author of Sacred Causes: Politics and Religion from the European Dictators to al-Qa'eda (HarperCollins).

This article can be found at:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml;jsessionid=B2XJSBVOIUUCZQFIQMFCFF4AVCBQYIV0?xml=/opinion/2006/11/30/do3002.xml

IRAQ: So Just Who Is Capt. Jamil Hussein?


They cycle of violence reached new levels in Iraq last week and into the weekend, but the military is complaining that one Associated Press report — and its source — was dodgy. (Photo: Karim Kadim/Associated Press)

Against the backdrop of the civil war, occupation, Baathist insurgency, sectarian conflict, and struggle against terrorists in Iraq, to borrow a few descriptors, in addition to the historic meeting between President Bush and Iraq’s Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki today, another battle is brewing. This one pits conservative bloggers and the military’s communications machine against the Associated Press — and the media at large.

At the center of things is one police Capt. Jamil Hussein. Mr. Hussein was the primary source in an Associated Press wire-dispatch last Friday reporting that Shiite militiamen had “grabbed six Sunnis as they left Friday worship services, doused them with kerosene and burned them alive near Iraqi soldiers who did not intervene.”

The report was picked up and widely repeated at various news outlets throughout the weekend.

It was a harrowing detail in a day of wider chaos in which several reports of Mosque burnings were circulating, and it seemed to tip the scales in establishing a sense of overall pandemonium in Iraq.

(For its part, The New York Times took note of the incident on Saturday, in a larger story about the mosque burnings, this way: “In the evening, a resident named Imad al-Hashemi said in a telephone interview on Al Jazeera, the Arab news network, that gunmen had doused some people with gasoline and set them on fire. Other residents contacted by telephone denied this.”)

On Saturday, the press arm of the U.S.-led multi-national force in Iraq, began crying foul, issuing a press release saying it had issues with the number of mosques that the media were reporting had been burned and, in the last paragraph, this:

The patrol was also unable to confirm media reports that six Sunni civilians were allegedly dragged out of Friday prayers and burned to death. Neither Baghdad police nor Coalition forces have reports of any such incident.

Flopping Aces The Flopping Aces blog has followed the Capt. Jamil Hussein story closely.

Conservative bloggers — principally Flopping Aces — had already been questioning the AP’s story, and Mr. Hussein in particular, and with this, it was off to the races.

By Monday, Navy Lt. Michael B. Dean, a military spokesman for the joint operations in Iraq, had sent an e-mail to the Associated Press (which somehow made it onto the conservative blog circuit in a flash), essentially saying Mr. Hussein was neither a police officer nor an employee of the Iraq interior ministry (MOI), and therefore, not an approved source:

We can tell you definitively that the primary source of this story, police Capt. Jamil Hussein, is not a Baghdad police officer or an MOI employee. We verified this fact with the MOI through the Coalition Police Assistance Training Team. …

Unless you have a credible source to corroborate the story of the people being burned alive, we respectfully request that AP issue a retraction, or a correction at a minimum, acknowledging that the source named in the story is not who he claimed he was.

The On Deadline blog at USA Today went to the AP with the concerns, and got this response from AP’s international editor, John Daniszewski, on Tuesday:

The attempt to question the existence of the known police officer who spoke to the AP is frankly ludicrous and hints at a certain level of desperation to dispute or suppress the facts of the incident in question.

Yesterday, the wire service moved a lengthy story in which they went back to the Hurriyah neighborhood in Baghdad where the immolation incident reportedly took place, and interviewed other witnesses, who corroborated the story.

(The piece also took a swipe at the military’s continuing dealings with message-massaging firms like the Lincoln Group.)

And so things stand today.

The one thing that remains unclear, though, is this: The Associated Press said in its story yesterday that Mr. Hussein “has been a regular source of police information for two years and had been visited by the AP reporter in his office at the police station on several occasions.” The military, meanwhile, seems to suggest that Mr. Hussein is not a police officer, nor a civil servant in the employ of any Iraqi agency.

So who IS Mr. Hussein?

This article can be found at:
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/so-just-who-is-capt-jamil-hussein/

SOCIAL: Social networking web sites under scanner

MUMBAI: Fan clubs which idolize underworld dons on social networking web sites have run afoul of the city police who plan to closely monitor the content and the members of these communities.

“Though nobody has complained to us, we fear that the communities would be misused by organized crime syndicates. Moreover, there are thousands of members of communities devoted to dons,” said Deputy Commissioner of Police (Detection) Dhananjay Kamlakar.

There are eight fan clubs devoted to underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and one each dedicated to Chhota Rajan, Chhota Shakeel and Abu Salem on Orkut.com alone.

"We will have to monitor the material posted and also the members of the networking sites," he said.

Social networking sites, especially the Google-owned Orkut, were in the news recently. The Pune Crime Branch had recently blocked a community which had posted objectionable remarks against the Maratha warrior king Shivaji.

A public interest litigation (PIL) has also been filed in the Bombay High Court asking for a ban on Orkut for hosting the anti-Shivaji community.

Earlier, while hearing another PIL, the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court had issued a notice to the government about the presence of a community titled "I hate India" on the same site.

So, the next time you log into these communities make sure no one is watching you.

This article can be found at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/649033.cms

HEALTH: 'Beware of Brush with Poison Paint'

NEW DELHI: A fresh coat of paint does wonders for your home but it can also be hazardous to health and your child's IQ.

Environmental and occupational health experts at the University of Cincinnati (UC) have found that India still produces and sells consumer paints with dangerously high levels of lead.

The toxic metal, which gives paint its luster and durability, was banned in the US in 1978 after scientific evidence proved that any detectable level of lead impairs intellectual and physical growth in children.

The UC-led research team, which published its findings in the journal Environmental Research, found that all 17 samples analysed from India had lead exceeding US limit for new paint (600 ppm).

Scott Clark, who headed the two-year study, says he is concerned about kids who are currently exposed to lead in their houses and neighborhoods and for those who will live in such places in the future.

Children ingest lead dust when they put their hands in their mouth such as while eating or sucking their thumb. Since lead compounds used in paint taste sweet, kids tend to chew or lick them.

A single chip of paint the size of a thumbnail contains 1 gm of lead and a few such chips can raise lead intake to 1,000 times the acceptable limit.

There is an increased formation of lead dust during repainting or renovation of houses when existing paint is scraped or sanded.

"Lead-based paints have already poisoned millions of children in the US and will likely cause similar damage in India as paint use increases,'' says Clark. The findings, he adds, provide stark evidence of the urgent need for an effective worldwide ban on lead-based paint.

France pioneered a ban as early as the 1920s but till date, India has no such curbs in place, points out Venkatesh Thuppil, director of the National Referral Centre for Lead Poisoning.

"Lead paint has a 91% market share in India. Homes, playground equipment, painted desks and chairs in schools and even the yellow school bus in which your child comes home, lead paint is everywhere,'' says Thuppil.

And it's taking a toll. The first major study on lead poisoning in the country conducted by The George Foundation revealed that 50% of children below the age of 12 living in urban areas had high lead levels while 14% had alarmingly high levels.

According to WHO estimates, 15 to 18 million children in developing countries are suffering from permanent brain damage due to lead poisoning.

Thuppil admits that the extent of poisoning from lead paint sources is not known in India. However, in one follow-up of poisoned children in Mangalore, he found that for three of the ten kids studied, lead-based paint was the only source identified. In one case, the culprit was playground equipment painted with lead paint.

Despite this, paint sold in India has no distinguishing mark to show lead content. A spokesman for leading manufacturer ICI paints, R Guha, said the company had replaced lead white with the more expensive titanium white some five to six years ago.

However, its paint containers don't advertise the fact because it's not mandatory by law, Guha said.

Smaller manufacturers make no bones about the fact that they use lead in decorative as well as industrial and automotive paints since it reduces cost by about Rs 2 to Rs 3 a liter.

"There is no law against lead-based paints," points out Nitin Khanna of the Indian Small Scale Paints Association.

And that's exactly what is needed, says Abhay Kumar of Toxic Links, the NGO which recently exposed the high level of lead in PVC toys. "Till there are regulations that can be enforced, lead will continue to poison our lives.

This article Can be found at:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-2115557,curpg-1.cms